Video Highlights
- Lee Williams wrote an article about the new concealed carry qualification test in New Jersey.
- Obtaining a gun permit in New Jersey is difficult and expensive.
- New requirements for concealed carry include a 50-round qualification course and firing from 25 yards away.
- The testing requirement is seen as an infringement on Second Amendment rights.
- The testing process is considered impractical and likely unconstitutional.
Video Summary
In a recent article by gun writer Lee Williams, the issue of qualifying to carry guns outside the home in public in the state of New Jersey was brought to light. The article discusses the new requirements issued by the superintendent of the New Jersey State Police and the state's attorney general, which have made the process of obtaining carry permits in New Jersey even more difficult and expensive.
The article starts by acknowledging that New Jersey has long been known for its strict gun laws and the difficulty in obtaining carry permits. However, the recent requirements take it to a whole new level. According to Williams, the purpose of these new requirements is to make the process as difficult as possible for applicants, effectively infringing upon their Second Amendment rights.
One of the most alarming aspects of the new requirements is the addition of a testing component. While training has always been a part of the process, testing is a new requirement that goes beyond what is necessary to ensure gun safety and proficiency. Williams argues that testing individuals before they can exercise their Second Amendment rights is unconstitutional and has no historical basis.
The testing requirement includes a 50-round qualification course, which applicants must pass with an 80% accuracy rate. The course is designed for open carry, even though open carry is not allowed for ordinary citizens in New Jersey. Williams points out that this requirement effectively prevents individuals from using smaller caliber firearms, such as 9mm or .380, which are more commonly used for concealed carry purposes.
Another questionable aspect of the testing requirement is the distance at which applicants are required to fire their weapons. They must shoot from 25 yards away, which Williams argues is an impractical and unnecessary distance for self-defense situations. He questions the legality of such a requirement and whether it aligns with the rules regarding the use of deadly force.
The testing also includes firing three rounds with the non-dominant hand, which Williams finds unnecessary and excessive for the average citizen exercising their Second Amendment rights. He argues that individuals should not have to be crack shots or highly skilled shooters to exercise their constitutional rights.
Williams concludes his article by stating that the testing requirement in New Jersey is likely unconstitutional and goes beyond what is necessary to ensure gun safety and proficiency. He predicts that lawsuits will be brought against these requirements, and he will keep readers updated on any developments in the state.
In summary, the article highlights the recent testing requirements for obtaining carry permits in New Jersey and argues that they infringe upon individuals' Second Amendment rights. The author contends that the testing goes beyond what is necessary for gun safety and proficiency and questions the legality and practicality of the requirements. The article anticipates legal challenges to these requirements and promises to keep readers informed of any developments.
