Four Boxes Diner

Illinois Magazine Ban: Anti-Gunners Employ Sneaky Tactic Restricting Use of Large Capacity Magazines
2A News

Illinois Magazine Ban: Anti-Gunners Employ Sneaky Tactic Restricting Use of Large Capacity Magazines

The recently implemented assault weapon and magazine ban in Illinois has raised concerns among gun rights advocates. A closer look at the nuances within the legislation reveals a sneaky tactic employed by anti-gunners to restrict the use of large capacity magazines. While some individuals may be relieved by the presence of a grandfathering clause, allowing them to retain previously owned magazines, the limitations imposed on their use for self-defense outside the home are concerning and may infringe upon constitutional rights.

U.S. Supreme Court Decision Supports Gun Rights in Tyler v. Hennepin County

In a significant victory for gun rights advocates, the United States Supreme Court has recently issued a landmark decision in the case of Tyler v. Hennepin County. The ruling, authored by Chief Justice John Roberts, supports the interpretation of the Bill of Rights in a manner consistent with the Second Amendment's right to keep and bear arms. Furthermore, the decision emphasizes the Court's commitment to historical context and textual analysis, rejecting interest balancing tests and underscoring the importance of private property rights.

Illinois Considers AR-15 Ban Due to Perceived Lethality

Illinois finds itself in the midst of legal cases involving the ban on AR-15s and other semi-automatic rifles. At the center of the argument is the government's claim that these weapons are uniquely lethal and not suitable for civilian use. This article aims to examine the different perspectives surrounding the ban and shed light on the underlying constitutional rights at stake.

Gavin Newsom's Proposed 28th Amendment Raises Concerns for Second Amendment Rights

In a surprising move, Governor Gavin Newsom of California has made headlines by proposing a 28th Amendment to the United States Constitution, aiming to restrict the Second Amendment's right to keep and bear arms. While Newsom's proposal intends to impose new regulations on gun ownership, it has inadvertently provided pro-gun advocates with an opportunity to bolster their cause.

SCOTUS Shifts Burden of Proof to Government in Gun Law Cases

In a recent presentation at the University of Virginia law school, Mark Smith, a constitutional attorney and author, shed light on the application of originalism and the burden of proof in Second Amendment controversies. Smith argues that the Heller and Bruin decisions by the United States Supreme Court provide a robust originalist approach to interpreting the Second Amendment. According to Smith, these decisions have significant implications for the burden of proof in cases challenging modern gun control laws.

Controversial "Guns to Gardens" Plan Draws Criticism: History and Concerns Explored

In a recent article from New Hampshire, a program called "Guns to Gardens" has sparked controversy and debate. The program aims to repurpose unwanted firearms into garden implements, with the intention of reducing gun violence. However, critics argue that this initiative undermines the fundamental importance of firearms for self-defense and protecting individual liberties.

Maryland Assault Weapon Ban Faces Uncertain Future: An Analysis of the Bianchi Case and its Potential Impact

Legal expert Mark Smith sheds light on the ongoing debate surrounding the Maryland assault weapon ban and its judicial journey through the United States court system. In a recent transcript, Smith offers his analysis of the Bianchi case, shares his predictions on the potential outcomes, and provides insights into the broader implications for the Second Amendment.

Mark Smith Proposes Thought-Provoking Questions to Anti-Gunners

In a recent video, Mark Smith, a constitutional attorney, author, and advocate of the Second Amendment, shares his unique approach to engaging with anti-gun activists. Smith proposes using thought-provoking questions to challenge their beliefs and stimulate meaningful dialogue on the topic of gun control. Drawing inspiration from past instances where questions had a significant impact on public opinion, he believes that well-crafted inquiries can be a powerful tool in advancing and protecting the right to bear arms.

Definitive Legal Argument Refutes AR-15/Magazine Bans: A Must-Watch for Gun Owners

Constitutional attorney Mark Smith has released a groundbreaking video discussing the most significant legal argument against AR-15 and magazine bans. In this informative presentation, Smith sheds light on the importance of understanding the Supreme Court's landmark decision in District of Columbia v. Heller (2008). He aims to dispel misconceptions and refute the anti-gun community's attempts to narrow the scope of Heller through the recent Serpa v. Bruin decision. Smith's comprehensive analysis provides a strong defense of Second Amendment rights and clarifies the legal status of AR-15s and high-capacity magazines.

Third Circuit Court Partially Stays New Jersey Carry Laws

In a recent development, a three-judge panel from the Third Circuit Court of Appeals has issued a partial stay on New Jersey's carry laws. The decision comes after Judge Bum of the district court in New Jersey had previously declared certain sensitive places laws and related issues as unconstitutional under the Second Amendment. This article aims to provide an overview of the panel's decision, the composition of the panel, and the implications for the future of gun rights in New Jersey.

Maryland Court Upholds Gun-Free Zones in Sensitive Places

Judge's Decision Criticized for Ignoring Supreme Court Precedent